TNNWC ENTREPRENEURIAL PUBLICATIONS

TNNWC Publications And Informational Products Division publishes The National Networker (TNNWC) Weekly Newsletter and The BLUE TUESDAY Report especially for entrepreneurs and early-stage venturers; free weekly subscriptions to these informative publications are available online to all entrepreneurial Members of TNNWC.

Membership in TNNWC is free (it's automatic for any subscriber to any TNNWC Publication) and available at our website. When you arrive there, just click on any of the JOIN US or BECOME a MEMBER buttons or links.

Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Friday, June 25, 2010

BALANCING HEALTHCARE, PUBLIC POLICY AND POLITICS: Trust Revisited

Balancing Healthcare, Public Policy and Politics with Linda de Seife


In the March column I discussed Trust as a component of Leadership and expressed concern that because of a lack of trust our country was in a state of paralysis. Well, unfortunately, nothing has changed and, in fact, I am concerned that the situation has deteriorated further to the detriment of the economic recovery.

Trust is the foundation of our economic system. Our currency is back by the “full faith and credit of the United States of America. Yet, a lack of trust is widespread, not only on a global level but in the everyday lives of individual Americans. The near collapse of the financial system in 2008 and 2009 has had, and will continue to have, a much broader impact than we realize. We will feel the effects in different ways for years to come, even when the economy turns around. This was such a shock to the American psyche that it will take a long time for people to feel secure.

From the financial markets to jobs to everyday transactions, there is uneasiness. Movement in the stock market is no longer based on the fundamentals of American companies; it is based on what’s happening both politically and economically in Europe, Greece and China. Americans are starting to feel comfortable enough to buy a new TV or a new washer or take a vacation, but they are not comfortable enough to buy a new house. The economy may have stopped shedding large numbers of jobs, but has not started creating enough new ones in the private sector to move the unemployment rate, and thus, make people feel more secure.

On every level it feels like nothing works any more. President Obama ran on the premise that he would be a manager and a leader who would bring efficiency and transparency. Yet, just the opposite has happened. It is just one crisis after another – the oil spill in the Gulf, Afghanistan, illegal immigration and the border crisis, and of course, the economy, which has not responded adequately to the stimulus, and the increasing government spending and debt.

The Administration and Congress have been throwing more and more money and power at a federal government that is increasingly incompetent and dysfunctional.

David Broder’s June 3rd column in The Washington Post was entitled, “Is President Obama’s Carter Moment Nearing?” At that time Broder concluded, “we’re not there -- yet.” Three weeks later, if we’re still not there, we are certainly much closer. The latest round of opinion polls from varied sources – Wall Street Journal/NBC, ABC, Gallup, Rasmussen all show Obama’s approval ratings in the mid-to high 40’s, down from over 60%. In addition, 62% feel that the country is headed in the wrong direction. Only 49% say Obama has ‘strong leadership qualities’, down 20% since January 2009. Furthermore, among Independent voters who gave Obama the election in 2008, 52% now disapprove of the job he’s doing.

While the firing of General McCrystal tried to show him as decisive, he really had no choice. Mc Crystal’s comments were insubordinate and that could not be allowed to stand, in spite of the fact that they were probably accurate. And, this story will be off the front pages in a matter of days, while the economy, jobs, the oil spill and illegal immigration will continue with no end in site.

In Carter’s day, every night the evening news updated us on “America Held Hostage.” Today, every night we hear, “Crisis in the Gulf.” Day by day Obama is becoming more like Jimmy Carter than the next Kennedy or Roosevelt that he aspired to be on taking office. The longer all of these issues drag out, the more likely it is that he will become a Carter. The rhetoric becomes stale. The American people want action; they want to feel secure. The insecurity of the current multiple crises will last for generations.

Health Care Update for Small Business

On June 23rd, The Center for Health Transformation (www.healthtransformation.net) released a Timeline Chart on the implementation of the health care reform legislation. It is a guide to all the rules, requirements and deadlines. Deadlines for action through 2010 are available now, and new ones are added every day. This could be a good tool to help small businesses stay on top of it.

Quote of the Month: “It is when we all play safe that we create a world of utmost insecurity.” – Dag Hammarskjold


For more information, please visit Linda's TNNWC Bio.



The National Networker Companies™ and TNNWC Group, LLC
Empowering Emerging Enterprises”
Membership in TNNWC’s Global Interactive Cooperative Business Community is free of charge and entitles you to receive both The National Networker Newsletter and The BLUE TUESDAY Report, as well as access to our unparalleled Suite of Business Services.
Join Us! Simply click on http://bit.ly/JoinTNNWC
Visit our website at http://www.TheNationalNetworker.com
Forward/Share This Article With Colleagues And Social Media:
Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, February 08, 2010

THE POINT: “Anyone can buy a truck.” No, Mr. President, they can’t.

The Point with Brenda Krueger Huffman


When I saw the television evening news clip of President Obama at the Boston rally urging voters to vote for Martha Coakley on January 17 with his statement “Anyone can buy a truck.”, my first reaction was “No, Mr. President, they can’t.” My first thoughts were: Not only can many not buy a truck right now, but many are having a hard time for the first time in their lives just paying for food and their house payment. Many can’t believe they are facing car repossession, a foreclosure, or even a personal bankruptcy due to a prolonged unemployment rate of officially 10% to a reality rate of 17%; or they can’t believe their business revenue has been down 30% or more for over a year.

Many have seen a doubling and tripling of their credit card interest rate and minimum payments (with little notice) levied by the same banks bailed out by taxpayers even though they have been good customers. And we watched Congress congratulate itself for “credit card reform” legislation enacted last year with enough time before implementation in the legislation for banks to drive up rates and increase payment amounts prior to enactment. We are all seeing a general economic job growth checkmate brought on by uncertain business costs (taxes, health care cost, energy costs) and a government viewed by wary investors as unfriendly to business and profit.

I felt this truck talking point, that was no doubt thought of as clever in the intent of mocking the populous appeal of Scott Brown by the speech writers that wrote it, actually revealed a not so clever absence of being relatable to one or more out of every five Americans struggling and wishing they were in a stable enough financial position to buy a truck. In fact, even those with jobs or a surviving small business would have a hard time buying a truck right now, because bank loans are hard to come by for those without a 700+ FICO score or for those who have any other debt. And given the credit card interest and payment acceleration games going on the last several months, many are now behind on payments or have given up which has ruined their once excellent credit score.

The majority of these same now financially unstable people were quite stable even one or two years ago and generally through most of their lives up until now. These people are not looking for a government bailout – they want an appropriate job again, an end to usury credit card interest rates, an end to unfair credit and insurance practices, and a government that sees uplifting the down economy as priority one. They don’t want deficient spending that will impact the next 50 years in stifling higher tax rates for all – including the middle class - no matter what is promised now. They want the American Dream again for themselves and for their children and grandchildren.

As we all know, the Republican Scott Brown won the Massachusetts senate seat by a 5 point margin – shocking in the bluest of blue Democrat rule states. Actually, I don’t think President Obama’s truck comment or his stump appearance in general lost the race for Coakley. I don’t even think it was completely the health care debate in Washington that changed the seat to the Republican. Simply put, the Independent voters were the deciding factor in both the Scott Brown win in 2010 and the Barack Obama win in 2008. Many voters, even those that are registered Republican or Democrat, are actually more Independent voters in reality. In other words, the more partisan the politics have become in Washington, the more voters have been turned off to being affiliated with either major party. Voters will vote for the candidates they believe hear them and will be a vote in Congress that reflects their voice.

I am currently a registered Republican, but my views are more in line with being an Independent voter. It would benefit politicians wanting to keep their jobs this November and in 2012 to get to know the positions of the true Independent voters again. For example, I am more fiscally responsible than any true liberal. I am more socially tolerant than any true conservative. I can agree to disagree with someone on my political beliefs without name calling or personally demonizing them or their political party. I don’t like it when our elected politicians can not. I don’t expect every citizen or every politician I vote for to agree with me 100% to consider them a good person. I feel I exemplify the Independent voter.

I think it was voters of all parties that were tired of those in Washington not understanding and caring that their political antics and statements are affecting the economy that put Scott Brown in the Senate. Job growth is affected by Washington’s actions when the confidence of investors and banks to provide capital for job growth creation is lowered. When confidence is lowered, business owners are hesitant to increase any cost, especially their largest operating cost, which is usually adding new employees and thus their salaries and benefits. Voters realize that those in Washington are not personally and financially being affected by a hard economy as many of them, the voters, are. Voters resent that government is the largest growth sector especially in Washington D.C. itself. This fact is not a plus for Americans who know all government costs are paid for by taxes, and that all spending by Congress is increasing the national deficit.

It’s obvious to a majority of voters the $787 billion economic stimulus bill has not helped the economy and therefore them personally. It has not created real jobs, stopped lay-offs or slowed corporate or small business closings. It has not made the everyday lives of most Americans more financially stable. They can not simply go and buy that truck as the majority in Washington can, and those in Washington sadly don’t even realize the average American can’t. Voters are frustrated with those in Washington playing games with the language and real results of the stimulus spending “actually” creating permanent and real job growth.

Politicians play word games and political spin games while the unemployed continue to look for real jobs that have not been created. Voters wonder where billions of stimulus dollars were actually spent and for what. Voters raise their eyebrows when they hear each $45,000 per year job cost 8 to 10 times $45,000 to create it. Voters shake their heads when they hear seasonal jobs, part-time jobs, existing jobs, and a salary raise in an existing job are used in the figures to calculate the sum of new jobs created.

Voters can’t continue to borrow more money when loaded with debt. They can’t vote themselves a debt ceiling increase or avoid the consequence of personal pain for being in debt. Voters have personal consequences for not being able to pay their current bills that affect them today. And these consequences may continue to personally affect them for years to come. They get fired if they don’t do a good job. They don’t do one thing and say another and then casually spin it away in front of media cameras. They don’t meet behind closed doors and then say how transparent they are. They don’t consider raising taxes in a struggling business climate as a solution to the rising debt problem. They don’t ignore excessive spending as a root cause of rising debt.

I am not a “right-wing pro-greed, pro-war, corporate loving Republican conservative” or a “left-wing big government is the answer to everything, redistribution, nanny-state Democrat liberal”. I am not an evil, greedy capitalist at all costs. I am not an “everyone deserves the same outcome no matter the output” non-capitalist either. Like most Independent voters, I am sick of extremes. I do not like labels being placed on people or political parties. I am an independent thinker, and I do not think “party” when voting. I have voted for both Democrats and Republicans throughout my life. I vote for the candidate I like and for who has the best ideas for solutions to our country’s challenges.

I respect our founding fathers and our constitution. I am proud of America. I understand America is not perfect. I acknowledge mistakes have been made at times. (I was furious with President Bush and his administration for the failure to act effectively in the wake of the Katrina disaster.) But I also know America is the first country to give aid globally, and Americans are the most generous people in the world. I know “freedom” is not just a word to Americans. Freedom and national security are the first elements in our ability to pursue happiness.

I know government has a given role in America. But, I also know government can be a deterrent to its citizens and their prosperity when it exceeds its given role. Like most Independent voters, I believe in the free-market, yet I don’t believe insurance companies should be allowed to set their own profit agendas that include the practices of denying policy availability to those that have ever been sick or cutting off benefits to those policy holders that do get sick. I believe there is a need for health insurance reform, but I don’t want the government to take over health care or to mandate its purchase. I believe tort reform and interstate competition should be a part of any health care reform discussion as well as honesty to the American taxpayers in the true cost of the proposed reform. I don’t want the cost to break the backs of businesses leading to more unemployment and to taxpayers leading to more personal pain consequences.

I have never been about color or ethnicity. I celebrate the diversity that makes America interesting and strong. I don’t believe any business or company is too big to fail. I don’t believe the government should pick winners and losers in our economy. I don’t believe the government should use the tax code or exemptions to favor one group of citizens over another. I believe in a helping hand safety net to help lift someone to more stable ground, but I don’t believe in the deliberate use of government programs and policies for a redistribution political philosophy. You don’t lift some up by pulling others down. You also don’t ignore those that need a helping hand. But, you don’t offer that helping hand by having government take over a free market segment – any free market segment.

Independent voters are tired of the arrogance of both the Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate. They are tired of the political rhetoric regarding the struggling middle class without job creation being the number one priority of Congress. They are tired of discussions on health care, cap and trade, and card check even being considered before working to stabilize the economy and affect real job creation which can only be accomplished by free market understanding and expansion. It can not be affected by government expansion which is in reality only taxpayer cost and risk expansion. It can only be affected by creating an economic environment in which confidence in private growth reward outweighs private growth risk. I am not an economist or in the financial industry, but I do have some sense of what has worked historically and what has not. I see what has worked in other countries and what has not.

I feel I have what many regular voters have, which is common sense. What I do know is you stop spending when you have no more money. What I do know is you don’t openly insult, talk down to, or ignore those you represent and their concerns and wishes. I believe this is why Scott Brown won the senate seat. He tapped into what the independent and common sense voters know, and he gave them confidence that he would represent their concerns and wishes in Washington.

He was smart to present himself as his own man and not a party man. He connected well with the independent thinkers and voters no matter the party affiliation they had if any. He drove a truck and didn’t give up when he was 30 points down in the polls a month before the election. He spoke with his voters - not at them or down to them. He listened to voters. He asked for their vote, and he made the voters feel like he deserved it. He assured them he wanted to go to Washington to get things done for them, and not to become a part of any political machine at their peril.

I realized the “truck” Obama used in his comment was really a symbol to me - a symbol of all that is the “American Dream” to many. That’s what Americans want – to be financially stable and to have the opportunity to provide for their families with dignity and pride. They want to be able to afford health care for their family and not have to fight with an insurance company for continued coverage if they get sick. But, they don’t want health care reform laden with excessive government intervention and new taxes. They don’t want new taxes levied on everyone except for those that are politically favored because of campaign contributions and lobbyist. They don’t want any bill completely being written behind closed doors and being rubber stamped by party affiliation without being read by Congress. They want to work hard and to pay their fair share of taxes, but they do not want to be penalized by business-killing tax rates and demonizing rhetoric by their own government for being successful through hard work. The majority of successful American business owners and workers are honest and fair - they want this acknowledged. They want those that aren’t to be appropriately prosecuted and companies that aren’t to be allowed to fail.

Both the Republicans and Democrats in government at all levels need to relearn who they work for and reintroduce themselves to the needs and desires of their “people” as represented in “of the people, by the people, and for the people”. Members of Congress also need to reacquaint themselves with who they were meant to be in the American “people” equation.

It would be smart for members of Congress to hold town hall meetings with the goals of listening and learning. (Voters do not want town hall meetings to simply be another opportunity for political spin.) This would allow meaningful representation of their constituents and ensure that members of Congress understand voters are now more independent thinking than partisan. Voters are intelligent. They are more informed and engaged than ever. And, it wouldn’t hurt to give up the limousine and drive to those town hall meetings to meet the voters in a truck.


For more information, please visit Brenda's TNNW Bio.


COMMENT On This Article!

FREE NEWSLETTER

Published by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. All rights reserved. Subscribe Free For Your TNNW Newsletter and THE BLUE TUESDAY REPORT! - Click HERE.
The National Networker Companies
Forward/Share This Article With Colleagues And Social Media:
Share/Save/Bookmark

Saturday, August 29, 2009

NETWORKING FUN FOR THE INTROVERTED: The Applause Meter

Networking Fun for the Introverted with Wendy Kovitz


In the few short months that I've been active on Twitter I've seen some momentous Trending Topics like the Iran Election and Michael Jackson's death. Everyone had something to say and the system was often too crowded to get on to say it. Yet we persisted, feeling empowered to see ourselves as part of the bigger picture as history plays out before our eyes 24/7.

Ice Cream and "The 40-Year-Old Virgin"
For at least a day, "Ben & Jerry's" and "Hubby Hubby" made it onto Twitter's Trending Topics as the ice cream formerly known as "Chubby Hubby" was renamed in support of marriage equality. LGBT/Equality rights enthusiasts ate up the positive message. A few short days later,

"a new and not-so-subtle bit of gay bashing came in the form of the hashtag #uknowhowiknowurgay which immediately hit the top Trending Topic spot with commentary that ranged from the bizarre to the truly homophobic."- from "Twitter and Censorship"
Quickly, the LGBT community and its supporters countered with numerous Tweets of #Yaygay. That was until Twitter removed both hashtags from the Trending Topics as a type of censorship to keep the peace. All Tweets are still in cyberspace, but Twitter just isn't broadcasting their popularity.

There are many, many opportunities to be offended while using Twitter. It could just as easily be a Trending Topic on Blacks, Jews, Latinos, Catholics... Recently I caught Whoopie Goldberg on BBC's "Hardtalk" talking about use of the "n" word. Her opinion was "it's a word." Use it if you want, whether you're white or black, but "be prepared to face the consequences." Twitter, of all the forms of social media, is not for the faint of heart, but it begs the question of what, where, when, how and why we censor things.

Political Death to the Czars
Let me begin this by saying that I am not a political pundit, nor do I think most of the political pundits out there are qualified to spin life to suit their agendas. We're all human. We're all bombarded with facts, half-truths, lies and fantastical gibberish and have to make some sort of personal sense out of it. That's why G-d gave us brains and chutzpah. When we can get them to work in tandem, we're unstoppable. Otherwise...

It appears that the Left and Right have been cyber-slugging it out a lot lately about health care reform and President Obama's speech to our country's children. Both sides have been getting down to grass-roots campaigns to flood Washington with their political objectives. What I found most interesting was the allegation that one-by-one the Right wants to scrutinize each and every Czar appointed by President Obama, as in the case of Van Jones, and work towards supplying the muck needed to force them to resign or worse. At first look I was completely flabbergasted. If someone gets through the President's selection process, let the man or woman do their job without the constant backlash of disgruntled opponents who are working to slow down progress.
But there's never just a first look for me.

In Adam's last article "Understanding the Networking Revolution" he enumerates disciplines that are important to the understanding of social networking. Thanks to a recent Google alert, I came across Andrew Lehman's blog: The Evolving Now and I've been following his thoughts on physics and biology and how they apply to social media. Here are two quotes from "Speed"

"a powerful feature of this identity shift is one where the commons becomes highly valued and contribution to the community is revered... The communities of our youth are far more than the few people in a local tribe. Hundreds, if not thousands, of self-selected individuals, folks connected to massive self-selected networks of their own, are coming together."

“As the speed of information increases, the tendency is for politics to move away from representation and delegation of constituents toward immediate involvement of the entire community in the central acts of decision.” (Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, p. 152)

Can McLuhan's Tetrad apply to how we view democracy?
  • Enhancement: What the medium amplifies or intensifies.
  • Obsolescence: What the medium drives out of prominence.
  • Retrieval: What the medium recovers which was previously lost.
  • Reversal: What the medium does when pushed to its limits.

What if technology is really making it possible for every voice to count? On every decision? Could we as a people be moving that much closer to a true democracy where the sheer numbers define the course of the country at every given juncture? Is that empowering or terrifying? Maybe a little of both? What are your thoughts?


Thanks for stopping by,
Wendy Kovitz

http://www.Twitter.com/wlkovitz
http://BookOfAra.blogspot.com


But wait! There's More...

Homeless and Tech Savvy?
This article is from InsideTech.com and talks about how job loss can affect any of us, and how one woman got around the subsequent loss of address to become a success story.
“Homeless people don’t use the Internet, they don’t write blogs, they’re not webmasters and they don’t use Twitter. They are alcoholics, they are substance abusers, they are illiterate. They don’t work. They sure as hell don’t have the right to fall in love. Do they?” - Matthew Barnes in "Homeless Blogger Scores a Job with Elle Magazine."

Sleuthing Time!
Another article from InsideTech.com gives us "non-creepy, legal" ways to "Stalk Your Way to a New Job" by familiarizing yourself with the man or woman you'll face in the interview using all of the social media at your disposal. Trust me, they're doing more than Googling you.

- Until next time!

Published by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. All rights reserved. Subscribe Free - Click HERE.
The National Networker Companies
Forward/Share This Article With Colleagues And Social Media:
Share/Save/Bookmark

Saturday, February 07, 2009

THE POLITICAL FRONT: The "Stimulus" Package - A Study In Self - Interest.

The Political Front with Douglas Castle


Dear Readers:

At present, the President of the United States is receiving a lesson in dilutive compromise -- that special effect which happens to any idea, invention or legislative bill when an inharmonious group of individual decisionmakers are much more myopically focused on their respective interests, agendas and politics than they are in the economic well-being of the people whom they are supposed to protect. And while Mr. Obama learns this horrifying lesson first-hand, the United States plummets deeper and deeper into a shattering economic depression. An economic stimulus package is undeniably needed - that part is unanimous - but just what "package" will emerge after this originally well-intentioned beast has run the gauntlet of Washingtonian politics as usual is not looking like anything like any reasonable person's idea of a Silver Bullet. In fact, the package (or rather the bill being discussed in the Legislature) is mutating in the womb as I write this.

The analogy is that the highly-compensated gods atop Mount Olympus are busily hosing each other while we mere mortals down below, all but forgotten, are being consumed in an uncontrollable fire. And the fire is growing in its intensity and destroying every object in its path. The blaze is out of control.

In properly-focused networking, teambuilding and policymaking, all parties involved 1) share a common vision; 2) share a measurable common goal; and 3) have a personal opportunity to reap some political, emotional or financial gain, but without conflict with the group's vision. If any of these three elements are missing, you have a recipe for slow-cooked compost.

Despite Mr. Obama's apparent good intentions; despite the desperate need for the government to take a definitive, leadership role in the shoring up of a dangerously failed economy; despite the time sensitivity of the mission at hand; despite the manpower and might behind this legislative C-Section effort; and despite the growing list of economic casualities in this fiery meltdown -- there is no plan, there is no bill and there is no concensus.

Sadly, our legislators are suffering from some conditions that are rendering them unable to unite and draft needed legislation:


1. They are well-paid, and do not relate to the problems faced by their constituents;

2. They have wonderful job security, without an assessment of performance, or a requirement to actually "produce" anything;

3. They put partisan politics and special interests ahead of the welfare of the State;

4. They do things to impede the success of adversaries, instead of reaching a status of cooperation in order to put their grudges aside and work in concert;

5. They do not understand the causality of the problem, do not share a vision of how to solve it, and they do not have a defined set of goals toward which a stimulus package would work;

6. They enjoy showing power by slowing the process until such time as their personal agendas and pet projects are incorporated into any programs;

7. There is no personal incentive to any of them to actually help solve the problem. They represent their respective parties, their favorite lobbyists, and simply enjoy a chance to find fault with the ideas of others instead of proposing solutions.

In brief, all three vital elements for effective teamwork and decisionmaking are completely missing from the legislative stimulus plan proceedings. It takes a good team, as well as a good leader to produce effective legislation. I am not certain that we have either of these.

When and if this bastardized, compromised, pork-stuffed patchwork behemoth of a bill emerges, it will likely be 1) unintelligible; 2) non-economically stimulating, and 3) filled with financial patronage and inflationary waste.

But then, I tend to be an optimist.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle,
THE POLITICAL FRONT
for THE NATIONAL NETWORKER
INTERNAL ENERGY PLUS
Access: DOUGLAS CASTLE
THE IEP FORUM
BRAINTENANCE
LIFE LINKS
___________________________________________________________
Posted to THE NATIONAL NETWORKER. To subscribe for your free newsletter, go to http://www.thenationalnetworker.com/. For the complete National Networker Relationship Capital Toolkit and a free, continuous RSS feed (available either by traditional RSS or by direct email), go to: http://thenationalnetworkerweblog.blogspot.com/. You are also invited to click our buttons:
The NATIONAL NETWORKER Toolkit
TNNW WEBSITE

Forward/Share This Article With Colleagues And Social Media:
Share/Save/Bookmark

Blog Archive

BNI News Feed

The Emergence of The Relationship Economy

The Emergence of The Relationship Economy
The Emergence of the Relationship Economy features TNNWC Founder, Adam J. Kovitz as a contributing author and contains some of his early work on The Laws of Relationship Capital. The book is available in hardcopy and e-book formats. With a forward written by Doc Searls (of Cluetrain Manifesto fame), it is considered a "must read" for anyone responsible for the strategic direction of their business. If you would like to purchase your own copy, please click the image above.

Knowledge@Wharton













Site Credits:


Featured in Alltop
ALLTOP Business
News Wire. HOT.
Cool Javascript codes for websites
KeepandShare.com(R)  Fabulous Free Calendars

Create FREE graphics at FlamingText.com