TNNWC ENTREPRENEURIAL PUBLICATIONS

TNNWC Publications And Informational Products Division publishes The National Networker (TNNWC) Weekly Newsletter and The BLUE TUESDAY Report especially for entrepreneurs and early-stage venturers; free weekly subscriptions to these informative publications are available online to all entrepreneurial Members of TNNWC.

Membership in TNNWC is free (it's automatic for any subscriber to any TNNWC Publication) and available at our website. When you arrive there, just click on any of the JOIN US or BECOME a MEMBER buttons or links.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

HEADLINE: In Paper We Trust(ed)




There are many “socially-accepted norms” when it comes to conversation that all effective networkers should keep in mind – subjects that one might deem appropriate when making conversation, of which religion and politics are classically considered “taboo”…


…so it is with fair warning that I’m going to be talking about BOTH RELIGION AND POLITICS in this article.


If you feel that you are easily offended by such talk, feel free to peruse the other TNNW articles this month. Actually, I would never have broached such “formidable” topics, but was lured (perhaps “tempted” might be more appropriate a term) into such dark waters, if not for one individual…


Along Came Mr. Rowland

It all started when I published last month’s article, A World Without Money in this very publication. In this article I suggested that our current monetary system is broken, perhaps beyond repair and posed a hypothetical world where money didn’t exist yet run on effective valuation of Relationship Capital (RC) and Intellectual Capital (IC). Okay…I may have had some political undertones to my discussion, but never once did I mention religion or the G-word: “G-d” (yes…many of us Bar/Bat Mitzvahed types spell it this way).


My friend, (and TNNW member) Jay Rowland, Founder of The Referral Marketing Association (a.k.a., ChapterTracker.com), made the following comments on my post:


As with your State of the Industry address, I feel you’re really talking about the issue of morality, not economic systems.


And

…you can’t love both God and money.


As well as


God’s economy is one of relationship.


I was shocked, in a sense, by Mr. Rowland’s comments. Aside from sharing a few political beliefs in my column and publication about networking, had I inadvertently breeched the religion/spiritual barrier with a few offhand remarks or was I making a stronger underlying statement by design? Either way, I was called out, albeit in a friendly manner and felt it a good idea to do one of the things I do best…write about it!


Morality and Economic Systems/G-d and Money

Mr. Rowland suggests that morality/G-d and economic systems/money are mutually exclusive, and unfortunately, he is right…to a degree. It is because of this that I feel we are experiencing our current global economic crisis.

Our current economic system is one of paradox. On one hand, the Founding Fathers of the United States, many of whom were members of one of the oldest running networking organizations in the world, the Freemasons, built the U.S.’s political and financial systems believing and imbuing into them the symbolism of Freemasonry. To be a member of the Freemasons, one must have a belief in that of a higher power – G-d. Therefore, all U.S. currency shares the common quote, “In God we Trust”.


To Mr. Rowland’s point, unfortunately, there is the saying that “money is the root of all evil”, and we’ve recently seen the classic “seven deadly sins” rear their ugly head to a head, resulting in economic meltdown. What took coinage and script imbued with the power and trust of G-d inscribed upon them and reduced them to almost meaningless hunks of metal and paper upon which now our trust is questionable?


Diverging Economies

From my perspective, here’s what has happened – we have abdicated our own personal power and externalized our trust into a situation where we have given power to an economic and political system that has diverged from G-d’s economic and political system of Karma and morality.


Some may argue that it is difficult to base such a tangible system of our current economy on such an intangible concept. To this I respond, our tangible economic system, once backed by such tangible “assets” as salt, gold, oil and even chocolate has "evolved" into something much more intangible.


For a while basing our economic system on tangibles worked quite effectively…it even curtailed our needs for more spending because we could not spend beyond our means. The downside to this was that the profit one could make in business was relatively flat.


But human needs, desires and ambitions work on abundance…our success is never an endpoint, just a milestone on one’s journey through life. Tangible assets, on the other hand, are limited. When we, as a human race, had the opportunity to graduate ourselves to the next level, we kept the same classroom, same teacher and the same curriculum. We just created new rules as we began to head into the new school year.


Those in the class who were ahead of the learning curve decided to make rules to make things more “interesting”. Unfortunately, they were weighted in their favor and refused to notice that by favoring themselves, they would be hurting others while ignoring the classic golden rule “do unto others as they would have done unto you”. They made the rule of credit, whereby we could spend beyond our means in return for speculating that we could pay back the difference in time. Thus began the downward spiral.


In time, words like “extortion”, “blackmail” and “highway robbery” would lose their significance as they were minimized or “spun” positively by those in power who networked and then eventually hijacked the political/economic system. At times, under the guise of being “G-dly” or “religious” they made their points known and got their agendas passed as more of the “regular people” (some called them “middle class”) got too busy playing by the new rules which didn’t at first effect them. The middle class became complacent and trusting into a system that was being perverted and compromised.


In time, the economic system changed to being backed by intangible means. A central authority of “oversight” based upon so-called tangible economic models, once backed by tangible assets would now be based upon nothing more than an “IOU”. Still the middle class trusted in the system…until slowly but surely, the system that “worked” for them at one time, began sorting them into two classes: upper and lower. Due to the nature of the system that was created, the 20% of the population that controlled 80% of the wealth began shifting to 10% controlling 90% of the wealth.


90+% of the people in this world have been taking the same class for years, passing it each time, yet never graduating to the point where it is becoming seemingly harder and harder to do so each year. The problem is that through faith in G-d to save them, they STILL GO TO THE SAME CLASS, EXPECT DIFFERENT RESULTS AND WONDER WHY NOTHING’S CHANGED.


How long must the insanity continue? How soon can we come to our senses and resolve this issue seriously and peaceably before things get worse?


Getting Back to “the Garden”

The question that I pose to Mr. Rowland, TNNW readers and the rest of the world is, how might things have been different if the “winners” of the economic game that has been created, maintained their ethical/spiritual integrity and worked to make everyone a winner. What if they networked to build and earn trust in a viable sustainability model that would support generations to come?


The key lies in understanding that an economic system based upon scarcity and hampered by the self-limiting beliefs of its creators and stewards does not take into account the abundant creativity and power as well as the sovereignty and stewardship of humanity. What if there was a way of merging the two economic systems: the Karma/G-d-based relationship economy steeped in “morality” and the economic system we use to feed our families?


Since we are already basing our currency (Financial Capital, or “FC”) on the valuation of intangibles, shouldn’t we utilize the who we know (RC) and the what we know (IC) that got us all the FC we’ve ever earned and leverage it into something of true value…a currency that we can really trust?


I believe that with proper valuation of RC and IC, we can create a realistically, spiritually and morally-balanced economic system that is scalable for the human condition and optimized for sustainability. Our technical knowledge of the internet and the populism of social media would allow enough oversight by which the playing field will once again be leveled and a one class system can be created. In this way, we would determine and have full control over our own “earning potential”.


I believe that creating such an economy would cater to the majority of the people in the world, despite race, color, nationality, political leanings, religious beliefs or sexual preferences. As one of my fellow TNNW writers and friends, Terry Bean, this month writes about the concept that we are all one, let’s take G-d off of our currency, put G-d back within ourselves and fly our flag under one world nation, one balanced and morally-blessed economic system, and one fully-networked "meritocrity".


This is not capitalism, this is not communism, this is not socialism. This is not JudeoChristianity, this is not Buddhism, this is not Islam. This is not American, this is not Russian, this is not Chinese. This is humanism. In this, we are all powerful and all meek at the same time. Why don’t we all inherit the earth together? And as for Mr. Rowland’s statement, “God’s economy is one of relationship”, I say AMEN, BROTHER…AMEN.


Adam J. Kovitz is the CEO, Founder & Publisher of The National Networker (TNNW).

Follow Adam on Twitter!




The Emergence of the Relationship Economy

Relationship Capital is the cornerstone of the Relationship Economy, which RNIA defines as “a measurement assigned to individual and organizational entities based on the relationship interactions between them, and the interactions they have internally.” I am proud to have contributed discussion of the Ten Laws of Relationships Capital to the upcoming book The Emergence of the Relationship Economy, now out as an eBook and in hardcopy. With a forward written by Doc Searls (of Cluetrain Manifesto fame), it is being considered a “must read” for anyone responsible for the strategic direction of their business. If you would like to purchase your own copy of The Emergence of the Relationship Economy, please click here.


_______________________________________________________

Posted to THE NATIONAL NETWORKER.



To subscribe for your free newsletter, go to www.TheNationalNetworker.com.

For the complete National Networker Relationship Capital Toolkit and a free, continuous RSS feed (available either by traditional RSS or by direct email), go to: http://thenationalnetworkerweblog.blogspot.com.


You are also invited to click our buttons:



Subscribe to THE NATIONAL NETWORKER

Link To THE NATIONAL NETWORKER

The NATIONAL NETWORKER Toolkit

TNNW WEBSITE
Forward/Share This Article With Colleagues And Social Media:
Share/Save/Bookmark

4 comments:

Peter Biadasz said...

Great article, as always!

However, you did make a very common mis-quote I have heard many times. You referenced the saying - “money is the root of all evil”; when the actual quote is _ "the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil" (1 Timothy 6:10). The misquote places blame on money, while the actual quote places balme, and therefore accountability, on a person.

Networking, as you mention, is about relationships. The more a person is responsible for his/her actions and attitudes the better a networker they will be. Placing blame away from ones self, whether it be money or others, deflects from the real issues a person may have that hinders their true success. Once a person deals with their side issues, we can move to a world in which race, color, nationality, political leanings, religious beliefs or sexual preferences do not get in the way of true, effective and continual networking.

Peter Biadasz
Author/Publisher/Speaker

Christine Sotmary, TNNW author said...

There was discussion on the radio last week, which I can't find at the moment, that asks the question "Are we doing the right thing by raising our kids to be happy?" The person being interviewed suggests we should be teaching our kids how to improve the depth and quality of their relationships because happiness is a transitory stat. Having strong relationships actually leads to true happiness over a lifetime.

Mark I. Clemons said...

I second Peter's comments. Let us remember that much of our current system is based on that scarcity mentality while a true relationship system is based on an abundance mentality. There truly is enough for everyone.
Mark I. Clemons
Master Teacher and Author

Anonymous said...

Adam, I hope you find that most people who care about significant matters in our world will welcome such discussion. Not only as appropriate, but as necessary. Don’t our beliefs ultimately drive what we do?

We will disagree on a number of issues, but I’m certainly not offended, because I know you are striving toward an answer to benefit everyone. The key is what we choose to discuss and how we go about it.

Terminology/jargon is a stumbling block, as different things come to our minds when we see the same word. (For example, you call for humanism and spirituality, but humanism doesn’t allow for anything supernatural…like God, Karma, or even a more general meaning of karma, etc. So I don’t understand your meaning for sure, but that word greatly influenced my response below.)

For the love of capital
Do let me clarify that I did not mean to imply that God/morality and money/economy are mutually exclusive. Rather, our attitude toward one shows our attitude toward the other. You can have both in your life, but can’t serve/love both. Other comments on this post point out the difference in money and the love of money…a human problem that gains much attention in the Bible.

In fact, love of capital is such a problem that any economic system will encounter it. Your question was: What if the people in power did it right (maintained ethical/spiritual integrity)? My answer is that such integrity should be our goal…and would be world-changing. But we are human. Even with a “reset” playing field and a switch to intangible Relationship Capital as our currency, the field will shift in favor of those who are more networked…and a few bad apples will spoil the bunch.

To achieve the end goals you dream of, our new economy would need to be designed as a charity. Politically, any meritocracy would also have to be a charity, as all people are not capable of contributing at equal levels of merit. (Who defines what has merit anyway?)

I say we should leave mention of God on our currency as a reminder of our place. Our problems arise when those with power/capital rely on their own personal power to bend outcomes to their will. As you say, “But human desires, needs, and ambitions work on abundance…our success is never an endpoint.” We humans are never content with enough. [Please do explain what you mean by people using faith to continue in debt.]

Merging morality and economy
How do we merge morality with an economic system? Honestly, if we include all of mankind, we need to play by moral rules that are common across all (or the majority of) faiths, and new terminology may be required.

Underlying our talk of defining a morality to uphold our economy, there runs the tension of conflicting faiths. We can take the word “God” off of our currency, but we cannot get rid of God as he made/makes Himself known. Because the definition of God comes from God, not from man, then by definition some faith is right, others wrong.

Our life is spent searching for the truth…and when we find the most likely truth, then we hold to that faith. We can spiritually and scientifically challenge our faith while still holding on. And there’s the rub. We hold on.

Your discussion of a new economy must take place within the context of those conflicting beliefs, not try to scrap or merge them. “Morality” then will require a common definition acceptable to most beliefs.

So we’re best served in defining a new relationship economy by thinking in terms of “rewards” rather than karma and “charitable policies” rather than humanism. Everyone believes in rewards of some form. Most everyone sees a role for charity.

Adam, you and I may be talking basically about the same thing, but in different languages/terminology. Some of your passages remind me of John Lennon’s song “Imagine.” I like the tune, but don’t like the world I imagine would exist when people try to replace God with themselves.

Wow…what a complex issue! But I’d rather have that complexity than drop the mention of God.

As so often happens, I didn’t even finish typing this response before a much more gifted communicator addressed the subject. Check out www.northpoint.org/GodAndCountry for a message to all Americans…regardless of their faith…about “In God We Trust.” Yes, this is a “sermon” by Andy Stanley, pastor of a Christian mega-church…but it’s not a churchy message, if you know what I mean. It’s more of a historical/philosophical discussion ahead of the “more spiritual” message to follow the next week.

A non-spiritual note about FC
Regarding FC (Financial Capital), how do we get away from that part of FC that serves to convert and store RC and IC? Financial Capital is perishable, but in human terms Relationship Capital and Intellectual Capital are even more so. RC and IC cannot be stored for long.

Believe it or not, I made this post as short as possible. :) Thank you for your attention if you read this far.

Jay F. Rowland
CEO, Referral Marketing Association
www.Refma.org www.ChapterTracker.com
blog: http://refma.wordpress.com
But who has time to blog when writing responses like this!?

Blog Archive

BNI News Feed

The Emergence of The Relationship Economy

The Emergence of The Relationship Economy
The Emergence of the Relationship Economy features TNNWC Founder, Adam J. Kovitz as a contributing author and contains some of his early work on The Laws of Relationship Capital. The book is available in hardcopy and e-book formats. With a forward written by Doc Searls (of Cluetrain Manifesto fame), it is considered a "must read" for anyone responsible for the strategic direction of their business. If you would like to purchase your own copy, please click the image above.

Knowledge@Wharton













Site Credits:


Featured in Alltop
ALLTOP Business
News Wire. HOT.
Cool Javascript codes for websites
KeepandShare.com(R)  Fabulous Free Calendars

Create FREE graphics at FlamingText.com